🇩🇪 Deutsche Version
Press coverage · 16 December 2025
Süddeutsche Zeitung
The most extensive account so far
Süddeutsche Zeitung

One man's fight

16 December 2025  ·  By Sebastian Herrmann and Georg Ismar  ·  Photographs: Friedrich Bungert

What the article covers

  • Reportage from 9 December 2025: the House registers an event of its own, and Lindemeier's assembly is prohibited
  • More than 100 complaints from the Russian House, three penalty orders
  • Robin Wagener (Greens) and Roderich Kiesewetter (CDU) call for closure
  • Bavarian Administrative Court, 24 June 2025: the Bundesbank was entitled to refuse payment
  • The Federal Foreign Office sees no legal instrument available
Why it matters The most extensive account to date, with a court ruling, political voices and live documentation of a tactic: the Russian House displaces a registered assembly by registering a counter-event of its own.

Sanctions and operations

  • Rossotrudnichestvo has been on the EU sanctions list since July 2022: asset freeze and a prohibition on making funds available
  • Language courses, a restaurant, concerts and theatre performances continue
  • Suspected dozens of rented flats within the complex, with only numbers on the doorbells
  • The Berlin public prosecutor is investigating possible breaches of the Foreign Trade and Payments Act
  • The Berlin data protection commissioner is examining the street surveillance

Money and treaties

  • Germany bears the property tax, budgeted at roughly 70,000 euros a year (see the note under „Summary“)
  • In 2023 the Bundesbank's financial sanctions unit refused payments on suspicion of a sanctions breach
  • Bavarian Administrative Court, 24 June 2025: the Bundesbank acted correctly
  • How the electricity has been paid for since, the Russian House will not say

Protest and police

  • 9 December 2025: the House registers an event of its own and Lindemeier's assembly is prohibited
  • More than 100 complaints from the Russian House, three penalty orders
  • A conversation with supporters was classified as an unregistered assembly
  • Director Izvolsky speaks of the Berlin police with great appreciation

Politics

  • Robin Wagener (Greens) and Roderich Kiesewetter (CDU) call for the House to be closed
  • The Federal Foreign Office sees no instrument available and points to the position under international law
This page summarises the article in our own words and provides context. Quotations are marked as such and serve as evidence; they are translations of the German original. The full text is available from the publisher only, the link is at the foot of this page.

A year after the unlawful arrest, Sebastian Herrmann and Georg Ismar accompanied Henry Lindemeier through a day he calls his „major battle day“: 9 December 2025. The reportage is the most elaborate piece written on the subject and the only one to document a tactic of the House in real time.

What happened: for that day the operators of the Russian House had registered an event of their own. Lindemeier learned of it the night before. The police informed him that his demonstration could not take place. Around twenty officers stood outside the entrance, because of him. His verdict that evening, quoted by the SZ, is briefly bitter: the Russians have won.

The SZ assembles the institutional frame around this: 29,000 square metres, opened in 1984, one of the largest Russian cultural institutes anywhere, operated by Rossotrudnichestvo, sanctioned since July 2022. Commercial events should not be taking place there at all. The piece cites the Berlin prosecutor's investigation into possible breaches of the Foreign Trade and Payments Act and the data protection commissioner's examination of the camera surveillance.

Legally the heaviest element is the Bavarian Administrative Court's ruling of 24 June 2025. In 2023 the Bundesbank's financial sanctions unit had refused to settle invoices for the Russian House because the scale of the electricity costs indicated commercial operation and therefore a possible sanctions breach. The Russian House went to court and lost. How the electricity has been paid for since, the House leaves unanswered.

Politically the reportage documents that the demand for closure is raised across party lines, by Robin Wagener for the Greens as much as by Roderich Kiesewetter for the CDU. The Federal Foreign Office maintains its position that no instrument is available.

Editorial note on the treaty position At this point the SZ reproduces the Federal Foreign Office's account, according to which unilateral termination is possible only after 99 years, and attributes the property tax to the 2011 agreement. Neither is accurate in that form, and the error is not confined to this article: it runs through almost all of the coverage. In fact the property agreement of 15 May 2013 governs ownership and tax, and it is there that the 99-year provision appears. The activity agreement of 4 February 2011, which governs what may take place inside the building, runs in five-year periods and can be terminated on six months' notice to the end of any period. The two treaties are routinely conflated in public debate, which makes the German government's room for manoeuvre look smaller than it is. Read the treaty analysis →